How it works

Turn your tribal knowledge into training that scales.

Time Machine is software + services. We combine proven adaptive learning methodology (DARPA + Bloom + modern AI) with hands-on operators who've spent decades building and scaling revenue and learning systems at A16Z portfolio companies, AWS, federal government, and Fortune 500. Both halves matter. Both halves are why this works.

The three-step process.

What you hand over. What we build and operate. What your team gets. Days from start to first learner.

Step 01 · Day 1

You hand over what your team already does

Sales calls. Zoom recordings. Call transcripts. Demos. Corp decks. Release notes. Playbooks. Coaching notes. Customer success workflows. Slack threads. No polished training content required, ever.

We ingest anything you have — messy, raw, half-finished — and normalize it automatically. Your team spends zero time creating new training content.

Step 02 · Day 1–2

We build and operate the learning system

Our enablement experts extract knowledge, structure expertise, and design adaptive learning sequences. Our AI tutor delivers them — multi-modal, mastery-based, personalized per learner.

Software + services, combined. You don't operate a platform. We do the work.

Step 03 · Day 2 onward

Your team performs — and the system gets smarter

Learners certify on real outcomes. Senior team stops onboarding and goes back to selling. The AI tutor learns from every interaction — what works for each individual, what works across the team. Compound learning. Year three is materially better than year one.

Part 1 · The technology

The science was already proven.
We just made it deployable.

Time Machine's learning methodology isn't AI hype. It's settled science — validated forty years ago and operationalized by the U.S. Department of Defense — that we made economically deployable with modern AI.

The science · 1984

Bloom's "2-Sigma Problem."

In 1984, educational psychologist Benjamin Bloom at the University of Chicago published one of the most-cited findings in education research. He compared three teaching methods across thousands of students:

Conventional classroom students performed at the 50th percentile. Students taught with mastery learning moved to the 84th percentile. Students who received one-on-one adaptive tutoring performed at the 98th percentile. Two full standard deviations higher than the classroom average.

Student performance by teaching method (Bloom, 1984)

Conventional classroom
50th pct.
Mastery learning
84th pct.
One-on-one adaptive tutoring
98th pct.

Bloom, B. S. (1984). The 2 Sigma Problem: The Search for Methods of Group Instruction as Effective as One-to-One Tutoring. Educational Researcher, 13(6), 4–16. One of the most influential findings in modern education research.

The "Problem" in Bloom's title: one-on-one tutoring is too expensive to give every learner. For 40 years the challenge has been delivering tutoring-level results at classroom-level economics. Time Machine is one answer.

The proof point · 2009

DARPA cracked Bloom's problem for the U.S. Navy.

In 2009, DARPA funded an audacious project: could a digital tutoring system deliver the 98th-percentile performance Bloom described — at scale, without expensive human tutors? They tested it on Navy IT training. Take raw recruits, give them a Digital Tutor, see how they perform against the 35-week classroom program and against active-duty Fleet technicians with years of on-the-job experience.

Digital Tutor graduates solved 74% of real Navy troubleshooting problems. Field veterans with years on the job solved 52%. Classroom-trained recruits solved 38%.

Recruits with Digital Tutor training outperformed people with years of actual experience. The methodology Bloom described in 1984 was, finally, operationally proven.

Why hasn't every company adopted this? Because building each DARPA Digital Tutor required 24 expert tutors and 6 content authors. The methodology was proven. The economics were impossible — until modern AI removed the content-engineering bottleneck.

Where Time Machine fits

DARPA proved the science. Modern AI makes it deployable for any company.

What DARPA proved
What modern AI adds
Mastery-based progression beats time-based: learners advance only when they actually understand.
AI assessment makes mastery checking continuous, not periodic. Every interaction is an assessment.
One-on-one tutoring lifts learners to 98th percentile (Bloom, 1984).
AI tutor delivers one-on-one at scale — every learner gets it, simultaneously.
Adaptive content sequencing accelerates learning by personalizing depth and pace.
AI personalizes per learner — and compounds over time as the system learns each student.
Authentic problems grounded in real systems matter more than abstract exercises.
AI generates scenarios from your real product, ICP, and competitive landscape — not generic content.
Required 24 expert tutors + 6 content authors per system. Each instance: multi-million-dollar build.
Zero content authors required. AI handles the content engineering. Deployable in days.
Part 2 · The expertise

Built and operated by proven operators.

Most AI training tools are built by engineers who haven't operationalized learning at scale. We have. Our co-founders and investors have spent decades doing exactly what we now help our customers do — building, scaling, and operationalizing GTM, training, and enablement systems at companies that defined their categories.

Co-founder · COO

Cameron Orr — The scaling

24-year CRO building high-performing revenue teams. Personally onboarded and trained over 1,000 employees and 5,000 channel partner reps. GTM expert in building and scaling learning infrastructure. Breakthrough Go-To-Market execution.

5,000+ channel partner reps trained personally across his career
Investors & advisors

Backed by category-defining operators

Long-time Head of Go-To-Market at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z), with deep expertise scaling GTM organizations across the a16z portfolio. Former Head of Global Field Effectiveness at Amazon Web Services (AWS), who operationalized field enablement at one of the world's largest tech companies.

a16z + AWS operator pedigree applied to every customer engagement

When you hire Time Machine, you don't just get our AI — you get the GTM and learning-systems playbook that these operators have spent decades refining, applied to your specific organization.

The flywheel

Compound learning.

Every interaction makes the system smarter — for each learner and for the organization as a whole. Year three is materially better than year one.

For each learner

The system gets to know each student

Learning style. Pacing. Weak spots. Strengths. The AI tutor adapts in real time and remembers across sessions, so coaching gets sharper with every interaction.

For your team

Patterns across the cohort

What works for your top performers. What trips up new hires. Where your messaging breaks down. The system surfaces this back to management — turning individual learning into organizational intelligence.

Over time

Year three beats year one

Switching providers gets harder every quarter — not because we lock you in, but because the cumulative knowledge of how your team learns and what works for your business is a real asset. Compound interest, applied to skill development.

Operational relief

Take 90% of the training burden off your team.

The reason most growing companies' senior people are exhausted is that training depends on them. Time Machine breaks that dependency. Your top performers' expertise becomes the training, but they don't have to be in the room.

No more weekly shadowing. No more repeating the same demo twelve times. No more pulling senior reps off quota to onboard. No more hiring enablement headcount just to keep training going.

Senior-team hours returned Per new hire, per quarter
245+
Faster ramp time First-deal velocity from new hires
75%
Training burden off management Coaching, shadowing, knowledge-Q&A combined
90%+
Common questions

How it works, answered.

What scientific evidence supports adaptive AI tutoring?

Two foundational research findings. First, Benjamin Bloom's 1984 "2 Sigma Problem" study showed individual adaptive tutoring lifts learners to the 98th percentile compared to traditional classroom instruction. Second, DARPA's Digital Tutor project (2009) operationalized that finding for the U.S. Navy. Digital Tutor graduates outperformed both 35-week classroom-trained students and experienced field technicians on real Navy troubleshooting — solving 74% of assessments versus 52% for veterans and 38% for classroom-trained recruits.

Time Machine applies the same proven methodology with modern AI, removing the expensive content-engineering bottleneck that kept DARPA's system in the lab.

Why does the team building this matter?

Most AI training tools are built by engineers who haven't operationalized learning at scale. Time Machine's founders and investors have. Ike Kavas is an AI patent holder who built software for Federal Government and Fortune 500. Cameron Orr is a 24-year CRO who has personally onboarded and trained 1,000+ employees and 5,000+ channel partner reps. Investors include the long-time Head of Go-To-Market at Andreessen Horowitz (a16z) and a former Head of Global Field Effectiveness at AWS.

The combination is rare: the technology team understands learning science deeply, and the operator team has scaled the systems we now build for our customers.

Do we need polished training content before we start?

No. Most companies feel they need months of content prep before they can adopt a system like this. They don't. Time Machine works from your existing material — recorded sales calls, demos, decks, playbooks, internal Slack threads, product workflows. The expertise is already in your company. We operationalize it.

How is this different from an LMS or DIY AI training tool?

An LMS is a content library — you build or buy content, the LMS stores and delivers it. Most LMS courses don't change a learner's behavior; they create completion certificates.

DIY AI training tools are platforms you have to operate yourself. Most companies don't have the time, expertise, or resources to do that well.

Time Machine combines software with services: we build the training from your existing material, our AI tutor delivers it, our team optimizes it continuously. An LMS solves content distribution. DIY AI tools solve content generation. Time Machine solves the whole performance-replication problem — end-to-end, for you.

How long does implementation take?

24–48 hours from material upload to first learners actively training. Most customers launch meaningful training programs within the first week. No instructional designer, no consultant engagement, no 6-month rollout.

What if our team's expertise lives in calls and Slack threads, not documents?

That's typically where the best expertise actually lives. Time Machine ingests recorded sales calls (Gong, Chorus, Zoom recordings), Slack exports, CRM notes, demo recordings, internal coaching sessions. The unstructured way your top performers actually work is the input we're best at turning into structured training.

Will this replace our sales coaches, instructional designers, or enablement team?

Not the senior end. Your best coaches still own late-stage deal coaching, exec relationships, and strategic work that only humans can do. What Time Machine replaces is the foundational ramp work that consumes 80% of their time and doesn't need a human. End result: your senior coaches do higher-leverage work, and you typically don't need to hire the next enablement person you were planning to.

Schedule a demo

See it work on your real content.

Software + services. Tell us about your team and what you're trying to scale. We'll come back within one business day.

14-day pilot · SOC 2 Type II · Setup in days · Or call 949-416-5055